Ellsworth AM Wheels – The $1,000 Wheels Reviewed
Wheels are a very special part of the bike. The single handily control how your bike feels on the trail and how your power is transferred to the ground. After my review of the Ellsworth Evolve and my recorded interview with Tony Ellsworth, Ellsworth sent me a set of their new $990.00 all mountain wheels to review.
At $990.00, these wheels are in the top of the mountain biking price bracket so the standard is set pretty high. For a complete spec on these wheels, you can check out the Ellsworth site or my preview post. For reviewing purposes, the wheels were mounted to my Ventana El Terremoto 6.0 (150mm travel frame) and they wore the new Schwalbe Big Betty UST tires (a true 2.4 tire – tubed). I have been riding these wheels for over a month and a half now in varying terrain. They have seen everything from local loops to shuttle runs to heavy rock gardens.
A Little About The Ellsworth AM Wheels
Highlights from the spec list include:
- Each wheel is de-tensioned 6 times, and then re-trued and re-tensioned again by hand.
- Each Ellsworth direct pull hub uses a full compliment of the highest quality Japanese EZO bearings.
- All Ellsworth spokes are direct pull to achieve maximum tension and quadruple taper and butted for superior strength and stiffness to provide you with a faster rolling, more durable wheel.
- Ellsworth rims have a wider rim profile that provides a wider stance of the tire on the rim. This gives the rider a larger contact patch of the tire on the ground. (32mm wide for this set)
- Claimed 2,376 grams
Weight as tested on Ultimate Digital (QR rear w/20mm Caps on the Front) – 2,420g
Front w/20mm End Caps – 1,100g
Rear w/QR Axle and No QR – 1,320g
They are only available in the polished stainless and black rim which ended up looking incredible on my bike. They are a 32 spoke, straight pull wheel. The front hub converts from a QR to a 20mm and the rear will swap between QR and 10mm. These are the provided parts with every wheelset (QR’s included).
The other parts were installed on the wheels which you will see later in the article.
Installing the Ellsworth AM Wheels
Changing the front wheel over to a 20mm axle is an easy process. The QR axle unscrews from itself and the 20mm end caps are set onto the hub. A rubber o-ring holds the end cap to the hub body and you are all set to place the wheel in the fork and install the axle.
Since the end caps are only secured by a small o-ring, they fall off very easily. As I was putting the wheel into the fork dropouts, the end caps kept on falling out (as seen in the above picture – the end cap is in the grass off the hub). Once I finally got them in, it was difficult to insert the Maxle all the way through because the end caps would not stay flush against the hub. There needs to be a better way to secure the 20mm end caps to the front hub.
Now that the front was taken care of…I moved to the rear. The cassette, rotor and QR went on like you would expect. I used the QR axle on the rear hub, but you can also use the 10mm bolt through.
Once the rear was in, everything lined up perfectly and the Ellsworth supplied QR had plenty of clamping force.
If you are interested in changing the rear axle into a 10mm. The process is as easy as the front hub, but the difference is that both axle configurations screw into each other. Both axles stay very secure in the rear hub.
The Ellsworth AM Rims
The 32mm wide, low profile rims gave the Big Betty’s a very wide profile (BB’s are 2.4 at the casing and 2.5 at the tread). It was actually so wide that at 60 psi, the tires rubbed the stays. That is the first time I have ever run into this on the Terremoto, but that brought a smile to my face. I love wide rims and at 26 lbs. there was no rubbing or clearance issues. The Ellsworth AM rims gave the Betty’s a very square profile which I really liked.
When I went to air up the tires, I did notice that the shallow depth of the rims did not let the retaining ring of the valve to grab enough thread. The result of this is a valve stem that moves from side to side…not that big of a deal really.
Ellsworth AM Wheel Hub Engagement
Whenever we talk about wheelsets, there are three areas that seem to be the most important in our groups.
- Weight
- Stiffness
- Engagement
Why is engagement so important? The faster the engagement, the faster the power from your legs moves the rear wheel. The more engagement a rear hub has…the fewer degrees the crank arms have to more to “engage” the drive mechanism and move the rear wheel.
The Ellsworth wheels use a 3 pawl, 24 point engagement drive system. As you can see by the pictures, the pawls are set up in pairs and engage the ring in the hub body. This makes for a very strong engagement system according to Ellsworth.
I emailed back and forth with TE on the subject of engagement because his 24 point is much less than the competition at this price level. Chris King’s ring drive is 72 point and Industry Nine’s 6 pawl system is 120 point. Long story short…TE explained that he wanted durability and less drag over faster engagement. You can see his exact thoughts in this pdf file.
Tony Ellsworth on Engagement PDF
From the email with Tony Ellsworth:
When I did my own hub, I wanted to really have the focus be on overall performance, and so, I made a conscious decision to go with a known low freewheel resistance and robust pawl for durability and reliability. Nothing ruins a ride faster then to have your hub cease to engage… I just wanted none of it. And that’s why there are the 24 robust POE in my hub that there are. When there’s a better way to do it all the way around–I’ll be looking to add that to my hub, but for now, my hub is dependable, durable and the mechanism that’s in there has millions of trouble free miles on it. That was my objective, that durability, and the known fact that the 24 POE, three pawl mechanism is a freewheeling resistance cue!
Now I am going to tell you why I disagree. In my opinion, there is two types of drag.
- Drag that can only be seen on the stand.
- Drag that can be felt on the trail.
Drag that can be seen in the stand doesn’t always transfer to the feeling on the trail. In the case of Industry Nine and Chris King, they may stop faster when spinning the wheels on the stand in comparison with the wheels from Ellsworth, but on the trail…I felt no noticeable difference in drag between the three wheelsets (I own a set of the I9′s and Kings). On the trail…I would rather have more engagement. More points of engagement mean better control in rock, tech situations and less gaps in double clutches. These are two areas that I spend a lot of time riding in.
Overall Ellsworth AM Wheel Stiffness
On the trail…these wheels are stiff. The quadruple butted, straight pull spokes do a great job of holding the wheels together under hard load. They hold a great line through rock gardens and there is no noticeable flex through heavy carving. If Tony’s main objective was to build a stiff wheel…he did it. Even through all of the pounding, the wheels are still as true as the day they were dropped off at my front doorstep.
For more of Tony’s thoughts on wheel stiffness…check out this pdf.
Once you had the wheels going, there was no noticeable efficiency losses. The weight of these wheels are what you would expect out of an AM build. There are a little bit more than a comparable Industry Nine build and just about on par with a Chris King build…so there are no surprises here.
What are my final thoughts on the AM Wheels?
Ellsworth AM Wheels – The Good
- Very Stiff Build
- Reasonable Weight for an AM Build
- Look Great On My Black Frame
- Wide 32mm Rim
- Easy Axle Change
Ellsworth AM Wheels – The Bad
- 20mm End Caps on the Front Hub Fall Off Without Warning
- Only 24 Points Of Engagement
- No Color Options
- Proprietary Spokes
- More Expensive than the Competition
Honestly…the positives of these wheels do not outweigh the negatives for me at this price. When I am paying almost $1,000 for wheels…they need to be almost flawless. The annoyances of the axles makes the set feel “unfinished”. Yes…they are stiff…but so is the competition at this price. When you are building wheelsets above the $800.00 range, there needs to be a multitude of options with near flawless manufacturing. The engagement of the rear hub also has to be 72 point or greater. I have had zero issues with the Chris King and Industry Nine hubs in terms of durability. There are people out there still using Chris King hubs that are over 10 years old. I was really missing the higher engagement on the trail.
I hope that TE and the guys over at Ellsworth can take my criticisms as constructive. They build an incredible frame, but these wheels need some work if they are going to compete in this price range. As they sit right now…they do not feel like $1,000 wheels.
What would make them $1,000 wheels?
So…now that I have said they are not $1,000 wheels, what do I think would bring them up to that level in the mountain biking wheel world?
It’s A Good Start
These wheels are a good start with the wide rim and stiff build. The problem is that at this price level, a stiff wheel build is expected not a luxury. I would not even consider buying an AM wheelset over 500 dollars unless they are very stiff and hold a line through hard corners and rock gardens. The wide rim is an added bonus, but the rim industry as a whole is moving in that direction already.
Engagement
You can have your reasons for going with a 24 point engagement drive, but it is not going to help sales at this price level. Engagement makes a huge difference on the trail. When we started sessioning a long rock garden, the gap in engagement started to become a huge annoyance. Up the engagement as soon as possible.
Finishing Touches
- Find a new way to attach the front end caps where they won’t fall off…this is a must.
- Offer Colors – I know that colors do not affect performance, but all of the wheelsets in this price range (minus Mavic) offer a range of at least hub colors. As riders are spending more money on frames and time picking out parts, they like things to match. If they are given two options with all things equal, they are probably going to pick the one that matches their frame if they can. I can’t tell you how many Ellsworth’s I have seen with multi-colored Industry Nines.
- Make the rim tubeless compatible – The space at the valve stem does not allow these rims to run tubeless. Having the option to run a tubeless setup on an AM designed wheelset would be a great option. I have switched a lot of sets over to the Stans Flow rims for this reason. They are light enough to run tubes but also run tubeless easily.
- Include several spokes with each wheel build – Having proprietary spokes is not as much of an issue if you already have some on hand.
- Price – Bring the price down. 990.00 for mountain biking wheels is too high (even with custom colors).

Do you want to become a faster and better rider?
Becoming faster on the mountain bike trail requires some sort of program or focus. Luckily for us, James Wilson (pro MTB trainer) put together the The Ultimate MTB Workout that will get you over that speed hump and make you a faster mountain biker. This affordable and extremely comprehensive program is exactly what you are looking for to bring the speed out of your legs and against the dirt whether you are a recreational rider or racer. Click here to check out The Ultimate MTB Workout Program.
If you are looking to increase your riding skills, Ramped Riding is a 135 page eBook packed with over 15 years worth of mountain biking experience that will make you a better rider instantly, guaranteed. Click Here To Check Out Ramped Riding































9:59 am
Great points on engagement Robb. After reading your thoughts and Tony’s in the PDF I am in agreement with you as well. I can see how the gap in engagement would affect the quality of ride on something like a rock garden. At $1,000 these wheels really can’t leave anything behind and as you’ve pointed out several things must be addressed.
Carl H. Martenss last blog post..Made to Order Bikes, Inc. and The Bicycle Doctor Partner to Provide Custom Built Mountain Bike Service
11:10 pm
I think you are spot on Robb, but I think you missed on other point.
WEIGHT
Like it or not, MTB riders are weight weenies. Some will deny it but it is always a consideration even for AM and DH riders. I recall looking at the spec sheet and gasping when I saw the weight. The AM wheels are heavier than the DH Industry 9 offering.
I would not even consider these as an option for my next wheel purchase. The proprietary rims, low engagement and heavy weight are deal killers at the $990 price point (at $500 they are a maybe). Not to mention the tubeless incompatibility and the lack of color options.
8:33 am
Good review. I agree with the general consensus that they offer nothing groundbreaking at a premium price. Not that they are a bad wheelset, but oftentimes good is the enemy of great. I applaud TE for trying to improve equipment for our sport, but it seems like they may have missed the mark a little. Hopefully your review and reader comments will be taken constructively.
11:34 am
How does the Ellsworth’s compare to the Shimano XT’s, in weight, engagement?
6:18 pm
I felt the review was bang on in your observations. Have you ridden the Carbon rims yet?
5:44 pm
@Woodbug: I have not tried the carbon rims yet. For my riding style…I would be a little nervous (ok…a lot) about using carbon on my wheels. I don’t even use carbon spacers anymore.
5:46 pm
@Dino: Weight and engagement compare to the older (last years) XT’s actually. The overall package looks nicer but performance of the actual drive mechanism is similar. The Ellsworth wheels are much stiffer than any XT wheels I have had in the past though.
I can not compare the wheels to the new XT sets because I have yet to ride one. When that time arrives…I’ll be able to answer that better.
8:55 pm
Um…snap rings much?
Hope uses them on their endcaps for 20mm conversion. They’re very easy to use and there’s no chance of the caps falling off.
$1000 is a LOT of money for wheels. You can get custom wheels that are exceptionally built with great components for a lot less.
1:11 am
We’ll get Rob, the next Rev on these wheels.
The objective out of the gate here guys was stiffness, directional control, maximized tire contact patch to reduce side wall flex, and to allow the same traction with LIGHTER TIRE (total wheel weight, including tires)… and rolling friction.
For sure, I’m working to make them better in all areas, but I think I hit the goal with the above.
POE is a durability issue. I love and admire my American Manufacturing brothers at Chris King and Industry Nine–awesome products, I own both… I deliberately stayed with the 3 pawl system because of its long proven durability.
If you weigh the wheel set with the lighter tire and measure your contact patch–you will see the weight advantages of the whole wheel.
You really need to ride the wheel to understand the goal—you can’t measure this wheel on a gram scale alone…it’s a ride difference, not a gram scale difference.
Next batch will ship with spare spokes–we have them in stock now, but your right, a couple in the trunk of the car would bail someone out if there was a spoke failure.
I’m looking into a thread in adaptor for the front hub like the rear–that’s the direction I’d like to go. The O’Rings haven’t bothered anyone, but clearly a thread in configuration would have some advantages. We’ll see if we can incorporate that without adding weight or loosing strength.
“tubeless ready” done deal! You’re right, valve stem hole is too big. I hadn’t noticed until I read the review, I’m a tube guy, UST is heavy and doesn’t hold air, everyone I know that has UST runs slim or Stans in them—and so what’s the point of the heavier system that doesn’t work? Personally, I hate slimy stuff in my wheels—I think STANS is the way to go for running tubeless. I just don’t do it and hadn’t noticed the larger diameter of that valve stem hole, but we’re fixing that right away in our new Rim.
Colors–won’t happen. I’m a real fan of understated elegance, the black on silver is where I’m going with this– Besides, the colorization of the spokes weakens the temper of the Stainless Steel… So performance is beauty, and in this case, silver is high performance, and thus beautiful.
Lastly, I’m happy to announce a significant reduction in the weight of the All Mountain wheelsets coming in December. It’s huge! And done without compromise on the other important stuff.
Finally however, sorry about the price. Good stuff costs. The wide, light rim I just designed with horizontal internal tapering in the extrusion, and hand welded seems, is expensive. It had to be extruded in an aerospace certified extrusion facility, and it had to use a proprietary 6XXX alloy. It’s strong and light, and wide. It costs a lot of money… I’ll keep sweatin’ the details though, and thanks for the pointers on this review.
Cheers,
TE
3:59 pm
Good job Rob. I own a set of Azonic Outlaws that I paid $300 for and you know what? 3 prawl engagement, 20mm axle caps that fall all over the place when trying to fit wheel into fork (makes it lots of fun on the trail after fixing a flat), and claimed weight is about the same.
I’m glad I didn’t spend way more money on a wheelset that has the same problems as my $300 set. Oh yeah…Outlaws come in colors for 09
12:31 pm
Nice review. It is like a rebirth of pullstar
That weight is atrocious. My DH wheelsets don’t weigh that much. Sounds like TE is on the ball in this respect. Wonder if he can keep the stiffness and lose the weight.
I think you are spot on in expecting better engagement out of a premium wheelset. Once you ride good engagement it becomes quite apparent that it is better performance. I am back on a set of XT hubs now and only after getting used to better do I realize just how nice additional engagement is.
Colors? BFD. Give me silver and black. Color matching ano bits is for wankers
I would rather ride my bike than stare at it. TE is on the ball here. Let those color loving Nancy boys ride someone else’s wheels.
12:52 pm
Great review Robb. I especially liked the constructive criticism because it gives Ellsworth something to think about and try to correct. I also liked the way Tony E read the criticism and has/is taking steps to correct many of these criticisms. I have never had an Ellsworth bike, but I have a good friend that loves his Truth. Tony E’s response really impressed me (as did his interview). I don’t think a lot of manufacturers would have even responded, let alone explain the philosophy behind each decision.
4:43 pm
Good review. The engagement and proprietary spokes are a complete deal-killer and a bad start, in my opinion. A new product needs to gain traction with an impressive start. EW missed the boat, especially since these wheels are too expensive for what we get. It will take way more than this to get me to replace my Chris King custom builds.
12:46 am
I just spent a weekend on the new 2009 AM wheelset on a 2009 Moment demo. The new weight is sub 1700g. Yes, 1700g for a durable AM wheelset! I felt no flex as I thougt I would. Don’t know how many engagement points there were but the rear hub was buzzing like a CK. I never felt any engagement lag. I was impressed with these and I want some – just need to convince the wife that these are worth the best part of $1K.
8:31 am
Plank
What other wheels have you ridden in the past?
The sound of a hub has nothing to do with engagement.
Robb
11:00 am
I have been riding crossmax XL wheels for the last 5 yrs. The Ellsworth set felt just as solid – although it was my first ride on a Moment so was hard to compare just a wheelset.
As to the buzzing, I was under the impression that when freewheeling, every click you heard was one of the pawl ratchet points clicking. The more engagement points the higher the click rate (which is why CK hubs buzz and the other systems click slowly when freewheeling)? Correct me if I am wrong…
Plank
11:14 am
Plank
The Ellsworth wheels use a 24 point engagement drive vs. Chris King’s 72 point. That is a large difference. My loudest hubs that sounds like they have the most engagement when riding are Hope Pro II’s, but…they too…only have 24 point engagement (like your Mavics). Higher end hub drive mechanisms (Chris King – 72 pt, Hadley – 72 pt., Industry Nine – 120 pt.) use more engagement points so that there is less delay between when your leg puts down the power and that power hits the chain line in route to the rear wheel. This also greatly helps “double clutch” situations where you need to have quick bursts of forward motion.
I never said that Ellsworth wheels were bad…just way over priced for what you are getting. For less…I can have a higher quality wheelset.