Schwalbe Big Betty UST 2.4 Mountain Bike Tires

Component Reviews, Reviews | 198 | August 22, 2008 at 6:08 am

Yes…you are not seeing things. These are real Big Betty UST’s and not a Photoshop rendering.

I received a call from Chad at Red Barn Bikes a week ago that went like this…

Chad:

Robb…the Sasquatch has been sited!

198:

What the hell are you talking about?!

Chad:

Your Big Betty UST’s are on the way.

198:

You have to be kidding me. I thought those were just an urban legend!

Sure enough…Just as I was ready to file the these tires in the same category as Big Foot and the Loch Ness Monster…Fedex showed up today with a very pretty pair of Schwalbe UST Big Betty’s.

About the Big Betty UST’s and Why This Is Funny

I have been a huge fan of Schwalbe tires for quite awhile. The Big Betty has been my go to tire for 6″ travel bikes because of it’s mass/volume, tremendous grip, fast rolling and surprisingly light weight for a true 2.4 tire (2.5 at the tread). They have, until now, only been available in a Gooey Gluey and Triple Compound version…no UST. I have always said that this tire would be perfect as a UST tire and at the end of last year…my dream came true. Schwalbe announced that the Big Betty was going to be available in a UST version in ‘08.

You can imagine my excitement, so at the end of last year I put a set on order. The original estimated delivery date was the middle of January. Then it got pushed to February…then it got pushed back more and more and more…

The Big Betty UST’s started to become a running joke between Chad and I as we waited not so patiently for their arrival. I seriously thought that the tires were never going to make it or that Schwalbe had a misprint. They must have meant January 2009!

When it is all said and done…I am happy to see that the tires finally made it to my doorstep. At 935 grams a piece, the Big Betty UST’s are light for a 2.4 tubeless tire. I am just hoping that they perform as well as the non-tubeless versions.

The Betty’s will be mounted, tested and reviewed soon so stay tuned for more information. In the meantime, here are some pictures.

Did you know?

By clicking on our links then shopping at JensonUSA, Hunk N Roll, Chainlove and Amazon, you are helping Bike198. We use them and LBS's for our gear. Thank you for supporting the crew at Bike198.

SPONSORS

9 Comments

  1. crisillo says:

    Looking good!

    Let’s see how they perform :-D

    I have a pair of Gooey Gluey BBs, but prefer to run them in the front…maybe a Tripe Compound wouzld do it for the rear :-D

    Oh well..let us know how it goes Robb

  2. 198 says:

    @crisillo: I would normally run the Gooey up front with a Triple in the rear. That is a great combo. Are you running a Fat Albert rear BB front combo? I have heard that a lot of people like that one.

  3. neilster1 says:

    Any apparent differences between the UST version and the non-ust version (save for the UST-compliant bead)?

  4. 198 says:

    @neilster1: Besides the thicker sidewalls…nothing yet…I should have a better idea when they are mounted.

  5. mr. tracey says:

    must…resist…urge…to…buy…for…bullit….

  6. RedRocker says:

    Wow, I’d totally forgotten those were even in the planning.

    Hey Mr. T – My Ardent 29ers are in :)

    Chad didn’t mention anything about my wheels, did he?

  7. paul m says:

    My Stinky D awaits your review, he/she has 2.5 IRC trailbear front and 2.3 Michelin All-Mountain rear at this posting, but Baby may need a new pair of shoes….

  8. jason says:

    I guess I should be getting my pair in the mail soon from chad as well

Leave a Reply

Tags: , , , , , ,